THE PRODUCT OF THE LABORATORY IS INFORMATION by Dr. Lester C. Krogh Vice President Research and Development 3M Exactly what is the product of a laboratory? Viewed as part of a larger business unit, a laboratory, together with all other parts of that organization, creates products. But if you consider the laboratory by itself, it becomes clear that its product is information, not new processes or new products. The following article examines the role of an industrial laboratory in terms of its information-generating responsibilities. A laboratory's effectiveness can be measured by the efficiency with which it performs technology transfer. Technology transfer is that activity which converts the scientific and engineering effort of a laboratory into new manufacturing processes or into marketable new products which provide a corporation with new sales and profit dollars. It also refers to the process of transferring new scientific information from universities to industry. Industry then further develops that information by applying it to new processes and products. Successful technology transfer is a key factor in a corporation's ability to compete on a worldwide basis. What is involved in technology transfer? Let's examine the two components of this term again. "Technology" refers to a body of scientific or engineering knowledge which is sufficiently developed so new products and processes can be derived from it. This body of information can be recorded in reports, patents and publications, or it can be contained in the working knowledge of R&D personnel. "Transfer" means that the group which has developed that knowledge has successfully passed it onto a manufacturing or marketing unit for implementation. Since we've now defined the product of technology transfer as information, it is logical to define the product of an industrial laboratory as information. Why is it important to recognize that the product of a laboratory is information? Because today it is commonly believed that the output of a laboratory is a new product or process. But the laboratory neither operates new processes nor makes or sells new products. When the laboratory is helping to develop a new process, its contribution is to transfer information defining that process to the manufacturing unit. Manufacturing then implements the process, allowing existing products to be made more efficiently or new products to be produced. When the laboratory is involved in new product development, it creates the specifications for those products, thus enabling the manufacturing unit to produce them. It also develops information about the features, advantages and benefits of the new products so that the Marketing Department can develop programs to sell them to customers. In other words, for a business unit to introduce new products, laboratory information must be transferred to both marketing and manufacturing functions. The success of a new product is highly dependent on the quality of that information and the effectiveness with which it is transferred. There are advantages to defining a laboratory's product as information. For example, this approach makes it easier to measure the output of the laboratory and, therefore, to rate its efficiency or improve its productivity. We can think of the laboratory as being charged with developing the intellectual property of an industrial concern. Intellectual property can be measured in terms of patents or copyrights, internal reports, and external publications or presentations. That is, intellectual property is any information concerning technology under development, and it is quantifiable. In addition, when the product of the laboratory is considered to be information, it is much easier to build a quality program. For example, manufacturing's quality slogan frequently is "do it right the first time." This is a phrase which confounds laboratory people because, in R&D, it is very difficult to "do it right the first time" when you don't know what the "right way" is the first time. A better slogan for laboratories is "do it the right way the first time." In effect, this means making proper use of the scientific method in setting up experiments to yield the maximum amount of information. Proper experimental design and the subsequent recording and reporting of experimental data have always been cornerstones of the scientific method in academia. Why should it be different an industrial laboratory? It is important, as well, to realize that the laboratory information product can be no better than the knowledge base from which it is drawn. Therefore, improving the laboratory's supplies of information will tend to improve the laboratory's effectiveness. For example, providing the laboratory with more extensive knowledge of customer requirements (e.g., via close laboratory/marketing and laboratory/marketplace relationships) makes it more likely that a "marketable" new product will emerge. Similarly, a more "manufacturable" new product with a higher probability of ultimate success is likely to result from increases in the laboratory's basic understanding of a technology area (e.g., via fundamental research). It follows, then, that another cornerstone to quality laboratory opera- tions is an information service which effectively accesses the open literature (e.g., patents, industry reports. etc.) . At 3M, we are finding that having a "quality information" emphasis in our laboratories expedites our technology transfer process. For example, it allows our manufacturing units to make products according to specifications with fewer experimental runs. It also increases the effectiveness of our marketing personnel, as they can feel more confident that our products will conform to the specifications published. In summary, we believe that, when seeking to measure or improve the effectiveness of an R&D organization, it is important to realize that the product of the laboratory is information. Traditional measures of R&D productivity (e.g., new products introduced, new product profitability, cost savings from new processes) are actually indirect indicators of how well the laboratory's information product has been transferred. We also contend that the quality of laboratory information can be improved by bolstering the knowledge base from which it is derived (e.g., via emphasis on the scientific method; laboratory/marketing interactions; and fundamental understanding, based on effective searching of the open literature). [This text is contained in a brochure issued by 3M in the late 1980's]