[The following is quoted from the July issue of _TQM_in_Higher _Education_.] "LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE YOU SERVE" by Clay Schoenfeld Responding to complaints about flaws in college and univer- sity teaching, research, service, and administration, some in academe assume a defensive posture and ask, "How can they say that about us when our cause is so noble?" Others in higher education are taking public discontent to heart and borrowing from the Japanese, via American business, an approach to improvements termed TQM--although the American Association for Higher Education eschews that nomenclature in favor of CQI. Whatever the terminology, the movement now has a new hand- book recently published by ASHE-ERIC: Quality: Transforming Postsecondary Education, by Ellen Earle Chaffee, vice chancellor for academic affairs for the North Dakota U. System and currently interim president at Mayville State U. (ND), and Lawrence Sherr, the Chancellors Club teaching professor of business at the U. of Kansas. Based on the assumption that what was once an acceptable fit between societal needs and institutional performance is becoming increasingly unacceptable to those who financially support higher education. The authors offer TQM as a "comprehensive philosophy of living and working in organizations that emphasizes the relentless pursuit of continuous improvement" and that "calls for a major transformation of organizational values, norms, struc- tures, and processes." Chaffee and Sherr clearly relate TQM concepts and procedures to the academic and administrative areas of campus. For example, they suggest TQM's applicability to admissions staff concerned about how long it takes to respond to student queries for appli- cation materials, to the faculty member wondering whether student are learning what they need to know to compete in the job market, and to the controller trying to speed up delivery of expense reimbursement checks to faculty and staff. The old practice of controlling quality primarily through selecting only high-quality students will no longer cut it, the authors say. They call for "greater attention to the quality o process, design, and output." To develop and implement a new approach to institutional quality, Chafee and Sherr say these fundamental cultural changes must occur: ù The organization's values, mission, and goals must be clearly and specifically defined so participants know what the end objectives are. ù The expectations of those receiving the value of the services must be considered when measuring the success of the activity. ù Each individual must accept personal responsibility for achieving the organization's goals and accomplishing its mission. ù Constant evaluation of the systems must become routine to know how successfully the goals are being achieved and the mission being fulfilled. ù The institution must train its personnel at all levels to ensure sufficient skills to accomplish the mission. But the book doesn't just spout platitudes; it's full of real situations exemplifying pervasive problems and practical solutions, and contains an extensive bibliography. "The primary job of administration is to remove the barriers that prevent people from achieving quality work processes," the authors prescribe, but "the faculty must play the most important role" in adapting TQM to academic activities. To them, Chaffee and Sherr offer this benediction: "When you are sitting in your office alone at the end of the day, wondering how you ever got into this quality business and not sure what in the world to do next, you can do one thing that will answer both questions: "Listen to the people you serve." For more information, contact: ASHE-ERIC, 1 Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036; Ph: 202/296-2597. Cost: $17. [For more information or to subscribe, contact: TQM in Higher Education Magna Publications, Inc. 2718 Dryden Drive Madison, WI 53704-3086 Phone: 608-246-3580 or 800-433-0499]