[The following is quoted from _Total_Quality_Management_Princi- ples_, a course book from the Unites States Army Management Engineering College, used for the Defense Management Joint Course, dated June 1992). [Begin quote] In late 1987, the American Assembly published a paperback edited by Martin Starr; its title: "Global Competitiveness: Getting the U.S. Back on Track." Chapter 8, written by A. Blanton Godfrey and Peter J. Kolesar, is: "Role of Quality in Achieving World Class Competi- tiveness." Some notes from that work: ù Begins with Wheelwright's list of American industries and products that have lost 50 percent or more of world markets since 1960. ù How has this happened? Godfrey and Kolesar allow some modicum of truth to the 20 or so theories that have been set forth to explain America's losses; but, they point out as the PRIME REASON: POOR QUALITY. ù No cultural issue, no trade issue, no automation issue, no labor issue, etc., gets at root cause of our problems more than we CAN'T RENDER QUALITY GOODS AND SERVICES!! ù Focus on quality FIRST: productivity and quality of work life will follow; quality of life, in general, will depend on doing the former. ù Authors note essential role of REQUIREMENTS as being customer driven! Specifications must follow these requirements. ù Three key steps: (1) assess customer's needs and expectations; (2) translate those to clear specifications; and (3) create a system to consistently meet specifications, and continually improve on the ability to meet even tighter specifications. (And that, in a nutshell, is Total Quality Management!) If we recognize all of this, why haven't we addressed it? 1. Top management participation (not commitment) is re- quired. 2. And, top managers (and all other U.S.managers)don't know what to do they are improperly trained. 3. America's business schools are not providing proper training. 4. Technical training is the specific target area. a. Statistics (variation in process output is the villain). b. Process improvement techniques. c. Teamwork. 5. Generally, math and science knowledge is too weak for us to produce the engineers needed for 21st-Century survival. 6. Generally, the government has played a very NEGATIVE role in quality thinking and progress in America. Educational institu- tion administrators and certification agencies have played a very NEGATIVE role in quality thinking and progress in America. Industry has played a very NEGATIVE role in quality thinking and progress in America. (Industry, like the other two, gets blamed for the problems.) 7. Generally, the U.S. has been aware of its LOSING position for at least 10 years. Are we progressing? No, not nearly as fast as our competitors! [End of quote] Reaction? Comments? The text of this file is available for download on the TQM BBS (301-585-1165) as QUALDIAG.ZIP.