[The following article appears in the Fall 1994 edition of _The_Public_Sector_Network_News_, pages 11 and 12.] TQM--THE MOST-ASKED QUESTIONS 1. What is TQM? An integrated approach to organizational leadership that focuses on delighting customers by delivering exceptional services or products. Key elements are: -- Bringing "the voice of the customer" into all aspects of organizational planning and decision making -- Organizational leadership that envisions future services and identifies the processes, products, and practices that must be transformed or continuously improved in order to achieve the vision -- An organized process to innovate and continuously improve work systems, based on the use of problem-solving tools, statistical data, and teams of those involved in the work process -- A focus on the management of the customer's "moments of truth," those occasions when the customer comes into contact with the organization and judges its performance 2. Isn't TQM just the latest in a long line of management fads? It can indeed become that if management orders others to implement TQM as a quick fix for an organization's performance problems. Bringing quality consciousness into an organization requires a long-term commitment of resources, time, and effort (particularly management's). Carefully planned and executed, it can be a catalyst for dramatic change. 3. Isn't it true that the majority of TQM implementations fail? Why is that? Yes, the data do show that, but that is also true of most other approaches to organizational change. There is no silver bullet for success. There are a number of reasons why failures occur: -- Refusal by an organization's leadership to lead the change effort by example and involvement -- Failure to focus process redesign and continuous improvement efforts on the key customer satisfaction issues -- Viewing TQM as a separate process from the real work of day-to-day management. TQM is the real work of management -- Viewing TQM as something that is delegated to the front line to implement bypassing the essential involvement of all levels of management in cross-functional project teams -- Viewing TQM as merely training in team problem solving rather than a change in the operating culture of the organization -- Using opinions -- not data -- to drive decision making -- Failure to measure results and use them to improve the process of improvement -- Failure to change the organization's operating systems (pay, promotion, recognitions, etc.) to reflect a quality culture 4. Is there one right way to implement TQM? No! Your best bet is to study the literature, seek out examples, and create a version that is adaptable to the particular needs of your organization. By all means seek consultant help (beware, there are numerous recycled consultants with instant expertise in this area.) 5. Should all of the organization be involved and trained as quickly as possible? If you have unlimited financial resources to invest in training, go ahead. But it makes economic sense to: a) Invest up front in understanding your customers and their needs and wants. Decide what it is you wish to accomplish. b) Provide everyone with basic information on what you are trying to accomplish, and how. c) Prioritize improvement projects and address them in order of importance within available resources. d) Provide just-in-time training to those who will participate in project teams. e) Develop key indicators to measure processes under improvement, their variation, and the direction of change. 6. Will I be able to show quick payback for my investment? If you put in the up-front work to clearly identify those issues that are most important to customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction and work on those, your chances are better, but there are no guarantees of quick success. Comprehensive organizational change often develops slowly. 7. Where can I turn for more help? Look for organizations in your area that have experience and learn from them. Read the literature, attend conferences, and join organizations such -- as the American Society Quality Control and the Public Sector Network